PPG ↑ and net efficiency ↑ generally favor higher values; opponent PPG ↓ favors lower values. Different schedules remain a factor; these ratings are not opponent-adjusted.
EUROPE / YOUTH EUROBASKET
One tournament at a time · teams, players and benchmarks follow this selection.
FIBA EUROBASKET · TOURNAMENT EXPLORER
Tournament explorer
Loading tournament data…
FINAL POSITION—
THE WHOLE FIELD
National teams
Select a country to explore its strategy, games and players. Final rank is official tournament placement; statistical columns follow the active phase.
THE TOURNAMENT ARC
How performance progressed
PERIOD CONTROL
Fourth-quarter outcomes
—
Games with a strictly positive Q4 margin. Overtime is separate.
POINTS FOR AND AGAINST
Scoring comparison, game by game
Both teams use the same points scale. Margin is selected team minus opponent; higher generally favors the selected team. Active team and phase apply.
PERIOD-BY-PERIOD CONTROL
Where games were won
Read left to right. OT combines overtime margins where present. Select an opponent to inspect the game.
STYLE OF PLAY
Attack the game from four angles
Paired opponents in the active selection, rather than the full tournament average. Compare bar lengths within each KPI.
WITH CROWLEY · READING THE NUMBERS
A little context. A clearer game.
Direction matters.
Higher shooting efficiency and net efficiency generally favor the selected team. Lower defensive rating and turnover rate generally favor it. Pace, shot choice and many event totals describe style and context.
A KPI change can reflect opponents, tactics, fatigue, shooting variance or score state. The direction labels are guidance, not evidence of coaching intent.
HOW THE PROFILE CHANGED
Group phase versus later rounds
Later rounds include the selected team’s championship and/or classification path. They are not all championship knockout games.
Strategic fingerprint
BOTH SIDES OF THE GAME
Scoring mix, game by game
Selected team and opponent each sum to 100%. Point shares differ from attempt shares; raw scores are shown above each pair.
RECORDED SCORING SITUATIONS
Tagged scoring situations
A pair of rows per game: selected team, then opponent. Incomplete, overlapping lower bounds; do not add the columns together.
INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION · TEAM CONTEXT
Who moved the result?
Rank players within the selected team, compare output per minute, and inspect actual opposing lineups. Ranks are not cross-country talent rankings.
WITHIN-TEAM LEADERBOARD
Contribution
Higher index, EFF and shared margin generally favor the player under this model. Minutes measure workload; opponent quality measures context, not performance. Select a player for detail.
MAKE ASSUMPTIONS VISIBLE
What should count?
An exploratory index. Move a weight to see how the rank changes.
The index is not a FIBA statistic, calibrated win probability or share of victory. Plus/minus and on/off are correlated. Matchup context does not isolate a player’s causal effect.
CHOOSE A PLAYER
Player detail
Show impact, efficiency & index components
Game-by-game progression
How is the team reference defined?
ACTUAL PLAYERS ON COURT
Matchup and substitution audit
This selector is independent of the phase and ranking selectors. A stint ends when either team changes a player. Margin is shared by all five teammates. Zero-duration free-throw stints affect plus/minus but not minute-weighted strength.
READ THE RANKING RESPONSIBLY
Definitions and evidence
A single tournament cannot establish a player’s causal effect. Roles, teammates, opponent tactics, fatigue and score state matter. EFF misses screens, spacing and defensive positioning. Unavailable or unverified values are shown as a dash.
Download all-team impact data ↓ · Download tournament snapshot ↓
CROSS-COUNTRY PLAYER COMPARISON
Different players. One clear view.
Compare up to four players from the selected tournament’s countries. Start with output per appearance, then switch to rates per 40 minutes to compare playing-time opportunity. Opponents and roles still differ.
Build your comparison
Offense profile
PTS · AST · OREB · TS% · ball security
Defense & rebounds
DREB · STL · BLK · partial box-score view of defense
Larger profiles mean higher statistical percentiles. Profile area is not an impact score. Rebounding, steals and blocks do not measure complete defensive ability.
Compare actual values
Follow each player across eight statistics
Each vertical axis runs from the lowest to the highest percentile. Trace a player’s color across axes; the dashed horizontal line is the 50th percentile. Scroll horizontally on small screens.
Show all raw statistics, appearances & minutes
These charts compare box-score profiles, not causal impact or shares of victory. The all-team percentile benchmark stays fixed when players are added or removed; phase, unit and minimum minutes determine the benchmark.
ONE GAME, IN DETAIL
Game lab
The team and phase above determine the available games. This game selector controls every panel below.
Score progression
Blue = selected team. Orange dashed line = opponent. The slider and score log include overtime; quarter breaks are omitted.
Head-to-head tactical signals
How this game unfolded
Contribution across the roster
Scoring event log
UNDERSTAND THE NUMBERS
Statistics & graph guide
What each number means, how it is calculated, and how to read it in context. Worked examples are illustrative rather than tournament results.
YOUR COURTSIDE GUIDE
Meet Crowley.
Start with what the number measures, then check the minutes, opponents and role behind it. This guide explains every statistic and chart, with formulas and worked examples.
Use the question marks beside the numbers for a quick explanation, or search the guide below.
1. Start with the question
Use totals for volume, rates for opportunity, and lineup context when comparing players. “Higher” does not always mean “better”.
2. Get help where you are
Hover or focus a question mark for a short explanation. Click it for interpretation, then choose Read the full explanation for a worked example and direct link.
3. Read several signals together
Check sample size, unit, opponent, and role. Use video to assess tactics and work that box scores do not record.
Definitions and source context
The calculations here describe this dashboard’s implementation. Standard event counts and box efficiency follow basketball statistic conventions; possession estimates, matchup proxies, shrinkage and the contribution index use the formulas explicitly documented above. External sites may use different definitions.
FIBA Statisticians’ Manual ↗ · Dashboard sources, repairs & data downloads →
TRANSPARENT BY DESIGN
Data, definitions & limitations
Participating men’s teams in the selected tournament. Actual published results and event data; no simulated game statistics.
Source coverage
FIBA establishes participating teams, final ranks, official results and competition phases. Detailed box scores and play-by-play come from published This Is Basketball game pages. The retained snapshot records each game’s source links and all lineup audit outcomes.
Team rebound and turnover counts include explicitly tagged team events. The secondary source’s player-summed box totals can omit them. Possession-based ratings are estimates; team comparisons are not adjusted for opponent strength. Player rankings use descriptive matchup context rather than causal attribution.
Official final standings ↗ · Complete source snapshot ↓ · All-team impact audits ↓
KPI dictionary and direction
How filters apply
Team applies to the team and impact pages; Compare players uses its own cross-country selection. Phase applies to player comparisons, to overview, scoring comparisons, player progression and the KPI register. Group-versus-later comparison deliberately uses every game for the selected team. A single-game ranking overrides phase for rankings and player cards; progression still follows phase. The stint audit has its own independent game selector. All active scopes remain summarized in the sticky filter bar.
Game-by-game KPI register
Loading visitor feedback…
Help us make youth basketball analysis more useful.